Most Council votes are routine. These are examples where members disagreed, meaningful money was at stake, or the decision process itself was unusual. The full archive remains searchable below the presentation layer.
Council considered reconsidering six pre-committed 2025 capital projects totalling $15.95 million and using that amount to finance housing and homelessness projects.
Council enacted the Brock Mission site-plan exemption and zoning amendment on a 4-7 vote under the strong-mayor provincial-priority threshold.
Funding to enhance the Trinity Overnight Drop-In Program failed on a 5–5 tie.
Council approved an integrated centralized customer-service model at City Hall with a $625,000 capital budget.
Finance Committee supported increasing the commercial and industrial tax ratios from 1.5 to 1.65 to shift approximately $3 million of the 2024 net tax requirement away from the residential class.
After the Mayor proposed the 2026 budget under MDEC25-4, Council voted 7-4 to shorten the statutory 30-day amendment period to the same day.
The archive deliberately focuses on decisions with useful policy, financial or governance context.
Tracked separately so residents can see how the decision mechanism was used.
The Brock Mission by-laws illustrate the unusual more-than-one-third threshold available for qualifying mayor-proposed provincial-priority by-laws.
The archive keeps the plain-language decision, stage, stated financial effect, voting result and official minutes together. It does not assign a partisan or “good/bad” score to councillors.
Use the full explorer to filter by councillor, topic, result and financial impact, or review the complete Strong Mayor timeline at the bottom.
Open full Council Vote Explorer →